One of the most interesting archeological and anthropological mysteries is related to the unusual, prolonged skull that is found today around the planet. For decades, scientists have claimed that such skulls were created by barbarian traditions, more precisely by connecting the heads of children, yet nobody could explain the difference in the volume of ordinary and prolonged skulls. The recent discovery has shocked most of the conservative and skeptical scientists because it revealed the information that the ancient prolonged skull was created as such in the mother’s uterus.
Matrix World pays special attention to archeological insights and unusual artifacts from the past. We believe that knowledge of what has happened in the past can greatly help in making the right decisions that have to do with our immediate future. The greatest danger to today’s society is the inability to learn about human misconceptions from the past and our collective unconsciousness of how we were born and how we developed.
In 1999, in the Mexican state of Sonora, an archaeological site was discovered, which was soon named “El Cementerio” due to numerous ancient graves. This site has been unexplored for decades, but a few days ago in the news media news that El Cementerio abounds in human remains with numerous anomalies.
The Time discovered that the graves were made somewhere between 940 and 1308 in the new era, and that they hide the remains of 13 skeletons with deformed skulls commonly referred to as the “Cone Heads” or the Dolphin Skull Skull.
Travel AOL has announced that Cristina Garcia Moreno and her team from the University of Arizona are confident that deformations are just another example of a prolonged skull, which was typically done by connecting the baby’s head to obtain an unusual conical appearance.
This practice is so widespread that it can be found in all the clutches of history from Egypt and Sub-Saharan Africa, Asia and Central and South America. But it can still be found in some tribes in Brazil and Africa that practice connecting the heads of children to look like “gods.”
We would certainly be pleased with this explanation that science is constantly forgetting, more precisely, shatters one at first glance with an irrelevant fact. The human brain usually weighs about 1.4 kilograms, while together with the brain fluid and brain membrane the entire cavity in which our brain is located has about 1500 cubic centimeters. Joining the head does not increase the space around the brain, but it only violently changes.
Most of the ancient skulls had quite a normal “cube” but some simply could not be explained by connecting and shaping the head because the brain cavity was much larger.
The Sonore problem is unique as the skull is derived from the more precisely from Paracasa il Ice. They can only be compared with similar skulls from Egypt and prehistoric skulls from Malta, which is further characterized by the lack of two skull skulls and a typical lipstick on the site where these bones should be tied. Almost the same thing we can see on an unusual skull from Puma Punku. The Dolcephalic skulls from Malta were handled by Dr. Roberto Zammita, but unfortunately this unusual anthropological ignorance is still in the cellars of the Malte Archeological Museum in La Valletti.
How to explain unusual DNA?
Paracas is a desert peninsula in the Ica region, located on the southern coast of Peru. In 1928 Julio Tello found a cemetery with extremely complicated architectural solutions. In the graves there were the remains of an unknown culture that had killed its dead in expensive fabric with a complicated connection, with overhead gifts in the form of a rich pottery of full food, but most probably the discovery was the richest graves were reserved for “people” with extremely elongated skulls .
Tello discovered over 300 pieces of elongated skulls, some of which dated to over 3,000 years of age, and considering that classic explanations of skull and skull extension could not explain the increase in brain volume over 25% expected DNA analysis to lighten this mystery.
Skeletons from Paracas had some unusual features, their bones were thicker than ordinary human bones, the teeth were larger, the lower jaw was much stronger than the ordinary man, and the weight of these skulls exceeded the weight of the typical human skull for incredible 60%.
Another riddle was the fact that the skulls from Paracas had only one bony bone (bone bones) instead of two bones, which are typical of human beings.
Thanks to the efforts of Brian Foerster, who specially focused on solving the mystery of South America, samples of bone, tissue, teeth, hair and roots of teeth with five extended skulls are found in the Paracas historical museum.
This process is thoroughly documented and the samples are sent to one genetic laboratory in Texas.
After publishing the results, Foerster stated the following portal Ancient Origins:
We found that the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA – deoxyribonucleic acid inherited from the mother’s side) skull from Paracas has unknown mutations that can not be found in humans, primates, or any known animal. Several isolated sequences of DNA from the samples taken showed that these mutations warn us that we have discovered a new kind of human being-like entity. This human being is genetically very remote (different) from Homo sapiens, neanderthals and denizens.
Ancient Origins claims that the implications of this discovery are enormous, and Foerster rightly says the following:
I’m not sure that genetics discovered in skulls from Paracas can be embedded in our evolutionary tree at all.
He also added that due to such a huge difference in genetics, members of Paracas culture could not match ordinary people.
And finally “cake cream”
Ancient Origins has recently released information that would make us intriguing not only for the issue of prolonged skulls, but also for the fact that the true information is hidden from us, and in part, they are so distorted that only fragments of truth come to the public. Namely, more than 163 years ago, scientists Rivero and Tschudi published a book titled Peruvian Antiquities, published in English in 1853. It makes it clear that the theory of skeleton and artificial skull is completely wrong because scientists do not take into account the remains of fetuses and dead babies that already had a prolonged skull. In other words, almost two centuries are known about the emergence of unusual human anomalies, yet we are still confused.
In order to further cast light on solving the mystery that captures the imagination of many, we will cover parts of the mentioned book:
We took into account many mummies with prolonged skulls, especially babies and newborns, where no other formatting was found. The shape of the cranio leaves clear clasps of the joints and slats with which the cranial is transformed while the head bones are very soft. It is important to note that the fact of the existence of many mummies of the dead and fetuses who have already had a prolonged skull has to be taken into account, which completely rejects subsequent formatting. We personally addressed the mummy of a woman from the cave Huichay who had a fetus with an extended skull in her womb. This mummy is currently in our possession and is used as a show to scientists who are convinced of the violent change of skull looks from the past.
It would be wrong to believe that only these two scientists had contact with prolonged skulls of children, babies and fetuses, the first contact of Western scientists in such cases dates back to 1838, as Samuel Morton had several exhibits in his collection in Philadelphia, and thanks to Blankley’s collection, the United Kingdom exhibited mummies of newly born and unborn babies with prolonged skulls in the Devon and Cornwall Natural History Society. Dr. In 1842, Bellamy provided a detailed analysis of the controversial remains, and at the Royal Medical School in London, he explained the differences between the skulls with a special emphasis on the prolonged skull from South America, which he called the “Titanic skull.”
Samuel Morton left a collection of photos you see, but besides that, Morton carefully looked at each exhibit and explained that we had to consider the big differences between those skulls that became prolonged thanks to the connection and its exhibits whose anomalies came naturally. Over the years, the American academy and scientists have begun to create a great deal of pressure on Morton, and he began to argue in the opposite way, but recall that he originally described a controversial skull:
Small skull with extremely prolonged bones, although nearly all bone bones are deformed, it is interesting to note that bones are more symmetrical than the typical bones found in American races. It is clear that the upper jaw is pulled outward and the ocular orbits are much larger and rounder than the normal human skulls. Hemorrhagic bones are almost invisible and fragile, and the arcades are not bulging at all and are simply flattened into the cranial bones.
Would you like to believe that science has just forgotten about the existence of the aforementioned works, but nobody can explain to us how scientific curiosity has never led to the exploration of the remains of children and babies with such unusual skulls.
If we recall a recent discovery from Chile, it will become clear to us that science is constantly refusing to investigate cases that can not be explained by our generally accepted scientific paradigms. Among the naturally mummified remains of people in the remote part of the Atacama Desert, a humanoid skeleton was found with some dried meat 15.2 centimeters long.
Soon the scientists learned that it was a liliputan who died between the sixth and eighths of age, but its unusual appearance sparked imagination because it did not remind of the human remains. Soon the Atacama liliputan came to the hands of scientists from the Stanford Medical School to once and for all calm down the disgusting “heaven” who did not want to believe that an unusual skeleton belonged to a little girl from Chile.
Gary Nolan, the team leader at Stanford, came out first to announce the results of the Live Science research portal:
He found that mutations cause terrible deformities that are in complete opposition to normal human appearance and bone size. Any possible nucleotide I have looked at on the rest of Atacama is human. We just stumbled on the surface of the analysis, but for now nothing of the results jumped out to warn us that it was an inhumane remnant.
As we have already mentioned the remnants of girls have deformations that can not be compared with any known illness or disorder so far. The skull is completely different from the human, with a strong deformation called turfophaly (elongated skewed skull with high elongated forehead), the neck is elongated and very thin, the jaws and bones of the face are very deformed as well as the occiput.
DNA analysis has created the most controversy among scientists because 9% of the Atacama liliputan genome is not related to human genetics.
Yet the liliputan from Atacama despite all was proclaimed the human remains, for some strange reason, the Stanford Team deliberately or unintentionally forgot to explain which mutation could make a human being of such shape and height, and most importantly it is possible that this human girl had 10 pairs ribs instead of 12.
Human remains from the other graves from the Atacama necropolis did not have any single mutation found on the liliputanche, even the easiest reference to turfophaly was not found, and where there was anomalies in bone growth and the number of pairs of ribs.
Ralph Lachman, a retired professor at California Medical College, LA, said the following:
There is no single form of dwarf growth, that is, liliputanism that would respond to anomalies on the remains of Atacama.
Ancient Origins, one of the most famous sites in the field of archaeological studies and discoveries, said that it would be most logical to conclude that aliens left a large part in our genetics, especially if we consider the theory of “Intelligent Design”. % of atypical genetics that can not be attributed to human, could simply be explained, as well as anomalies in liliputan growth and appearance of skeleton.
This is just one of the evidence we know a little, and that “knowledge” is deformed at every step. With a sincere interest, we will continue to follow rare research on the associated skulls that come to the public because we are interested in what is hidden in our past history, and we are even more interested in who is in the interest of knowing me little or no.